Differentiation

Differentiation that keeps the same goal for every learner.

Get a differentiation plan. Enter lesson, learner range, and objectives.

01

How it works.

Provide lesson, learner range and get a complete differentiation plan in minutes — including tiers, scaffolds, UDL. Free AI workflow, no signup required to preview.

Start now

Plan my differentiation

02
Differentiation plan: by content/process/product/environment, tiers, supports (UDL/Tomlinson), assessment of objective mastery per tier.
Format & standard
03

What good looks like.

01

What it must include

Criteria
  • 01Differentiation across Tomlinson's four dimensions (content, process, product, learning environment) — the plan does not default to 'tier the worksheet' or 'give more time'.
  • 02Tiered tasks for different readiness levels while holding the core objective constant for all students — challenge and support without creating parallel curricula or lowering the bar.
  • 03Specific supports for ELL, IEP/504, and GT students named with the exact scaffolds or extensions — the plan is not 'differentiate for everyone' in the abstract.
  • 04Flexible grouping and choice/interest options that let students access the objective through different paths — voice and ownership are built in, not afterthoughts.
  • 05Scaffolds and extensions that are concrete and usable tomorrow (sentence frames, graphic organizers, compacted contracts, menu choices) — not vague 'provide support as needed'.
  • 06UDL principles applied so multiple means of engagement, representation, and action are available — the design is accessible by default rather than retrofitted.
  • 07Alignment back to the same core objective for every tier or path — differentiation does not become dilution or busywork for some students.
02

Signals of expertise

Quality
  • Names Tomlinson's content/process/product/environment framework and UDL multiple means explicitly — the planner is using the actual research language, not buzzwords.
  • Tiers by readiness while protecting the objective for all — shows the writer refuses to lower the bar for some students under the guise of 'meeting them where they are'.
  • Writes specific, observable supports for named populations (ELL sentence frames by WIDA level, GT compacted projects) rather than 'extra help' — the plan can be executed by a sub or co-teacher.
03

Common mistakes

Pitfalls
  • ×'More or less work' as the only differentiation move — fast finishers get busywork and struggling students get the same task with fewer problems, so no one gets what they need.
  • ×Lowering the objective for some students instead of changing the path to the same objective — creates permanent gaps and tracks students early.
  • ×Ignoring specific populations (ELL, IEP, GT) or writing one generic paragraph — the plan fails the students who need targeted moves the most.
  • ×No UDL or choice options — every student is forced through the same representation and output mode regardless of strength or barrier.